New River
Watershed Roundtable, Inc.
P.O.
Box 1506 • Dublin,
VA • 24084 • phone 540-643-2590
website
<http://www.vawatersheds.org/newriver>
shared
calendar <calendars.yahoo.com/newriverwatershedroundtable>
email<newriverwatershedroundtable@yahoo.com>
Thursday, May 4, 2006
New
River Valley Competitiveness
Center, Fairlawn
9:30-11:30, Conference Room
DRAFT
Executive Committee Meeting Minutes
In attendance:
Executive committee – Cynthia Hancock, Mike Harvey, Charlie
Maus, Llyn Sharp, Darla Jennings, Ron Powers
Others – Tim Ott (TAC), Dave Robertson, Jerry Moles, Gene
Yagow, Stuart Black, Dale Black, Mike McLeod
INTRODUCTIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Dale and Stuart Black, see letter in packet
- Intergovernmental
relationships are Dale’s main interest and experience
Claytor Relicensing comments due May 6, 2006—Darla is compiling FOCL comments
UPCOMING MEETINGS
Need a rep for Richmond DGIF meeting May 15, 7:00pm Ron
will go
ExComm Thursday, June 1 --need mtg place
- Ask
Clarke about wastewater plant (639 3947) [Llyn will contact]
NRWR Board Friday July 7 9-12 Grayson Commons (bathrooms
next door)
Need a place for ExComm to meet in August
Need a place for Board to meet in October
- 1908
Courthouse?
- Conference
center at Claytor? Llyn will check on availability.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
approve
minutes/notes from March
- motion
Darla Jennings/ second Mike Harvey; approved
WQIA awards—summary attached
- Cynthia
concerned about co-holds of easements.
501(c)3
- September 5, 2005 is
incorporation date. Application is
complete, if we wait till June we can expedite. We will get a definite ruling then 3
weeks later we would get notice. Decision to wait until June to file the
paperwork. (Maus/Hancock; approved)
DISCUSSION ITEMS
Stroubles Creek TMDL-IP assistance, Gene Yagow
- Plan
not yet approved by EPA. Still
working with SWCD to come up with conservation plan on VT Foundation
Land. SCWI request for 319 support for a coordinator did not meet with immediate
support, funds are spread very thin, still worth pursuing.
- Dale:
local governments are the ones with authority to guide landuse impacts.
- Gene:
There are several TMDL plans in the New River area
ready for implementation.
- EPA
319 fund come to DCR from EPA
- Holmes
Creek had a coordinator
- Sometimes
a district employee serves that function.
- Charlie,
Tim: 319 funding will likely be reduced; impacts optional karst programs
and other DCR programs.
- Charlie:
does NRWR want to strengthen base by administering mandatory program like
TMDL?
- Llyn:
Can NRWR apply for 319 direct to EPA?
[yes]
- Gene:
STroubles anticipates needing 1/2 time coordinator for 3 years. Educational activities and development
on agricultural land will be done.
- Charlie
and Cynthia: Within DCR/DEQ there are already wheels turning- so it may be
role of NRWR to push for staffing through agencies.
- Cynthia:
TMDL process in New River Valley
- Stroubles
is unique (few landowners and urban impacts). MS4 program education possible on
Stroubles and not other TMDL streams
- The
other TMDLs are agricultural so the person for Stroubles may not be the
person for the rest of the watershed.
- Charlie:
Isn’t this mostly administrative anyway, so same person with NRWR might be
able to do it?
- Jerry:
501(c)3 does have more political freedom. State agency can’t have access to
government and can’t lobby for funding.
- Cynthia:
Best for Roundtable to support agencies.
Right now Mill/Dodd are on IP funding
list, which will be handled through Skyline –we can provide education,
technical and administrative support.
- Charlie:
Stroubles Creek IP – there are 3 players: VT, TOB,
VT Found. Why doesn’t the SCWI get 501(c)3 and do this?
- SCWI is first trying to work with
existing structures rather than create a new one,.
- David:
His Greater Lynchburg Environmental Network has partners and tries to get
agencies to pay attention to issues or maybe takes lead on ad hoc
projects. But they are only just
coming into needing 501(c)3.
LandCare Initiative, David Robertson and Jerry Moles
- “Headwaters
at VT LandCare” partnership – New, Roanoke,
James (upper watershed)
- Jerry:
Return capital to rural area.
10-40% off land is getting taken up by invasive species. As a roundtable we have a service and
marketing problem; what are we offering?
- Landcare
is still running on trying to hold more money locally (not yet looking at
creating a market for those outside the area to pay for services provided
by the idle behavior of the land).
- David:
LandCare as a term is a way of talking about people and the land that
doesn’t currently have any baggage.
Landcare is a social movement to improve economy, environment and
community (the “triple bottom line”).
- In Australia
government provides funding for projects and facilitators, and now there
is also corporate funding. This has
raised the awareness of urban areas for their upstream rural areas.
- Australia
has asked the US
to help take initiatives global. On
the national scope, the US
is a landcare pioneers. Council for
US
landcare initiatives include corporate and government leaders. This includes the USDA (a leader,
especially through the NRCS), Department of Interior, the National
Association of Regional Councils, Nationals Conservation Districts and
National Association of RC and DS.
Could have a MOU with the latter three. Check out http://www.landcareonline.com/. Other NGOs on their list are watershed
groups and councils; landscaping and lawn-care professionals will be part
of movement. Check out “Planet”, a
professional landcare network.
- National
landcare will be hosted at VT in July/August 2006. Cargill Corporation is part of landcare
national. VT may be writing the
manual for how to start landcare nationally. VT has the Blueridge Forest Coop
($100,000 funded by southern states to help them obtain coop status) and,
potentially, the slaughterhouse co-op.
- At
the national level in the US
they are possibly looking too much at Australia. Landcare would not happen without
facilitators at the sub-catchment level.
- Need
something to harness multiple institutions, local facilitator to pull
resources together in the current institutional arrangement
- Dale:
Does USDA fund this?
- Dave:
USDA is not currently funding landcare, but landcare is a group with
political and corporate power
- David:
Bush administration has “cooperative conservation” initiative, which is
very much similar to landcare.
- Dale:
Jerry, are you here to involve the NRWR in landcare?
- VT
229 Council: David is talking to them tomorrow. Extension will help the movement. Universities, Extension, and Watershed
councils have a role in landcare.
- NRWR
has concentrated on government/agency programs but there is an economic
aspect and business sense.
Political clout will derive from making business sense.
- Ron:
NRWR wants to be a serious partner in landcare and would like to be called
on for support.
- New
River basin may lead national attention
New River Symposium Report, Rick Roth
(will be held May 17-19, 2007
at RV
Need rep
for Community Foundation luncheon May 23rd; Ron said yes
Workplan 2006
Annual meeting, facilitator: We should have an annual meeting acccording
to bylaws. Charlie will contact Steve Talley.
Cleanup group—need to find a replacement for Kelly
from TAC to provide support to this group
Funding
opportunity—there is DOF funding $10K for riparian buffer planting mostly
Need to Close out the Steering
Committee Workplan and report out 2004-05
due to lack of time the following
were tabled until our next meeting:
Funding Requests:
memberships:
American
Rivers, River Network
NCNR, WVRC,
FORVA, Coastal Canoeists, VWMC, VAWA, VCWQ,
signage ~$150-$200
New River
Symposium Planning Meeting
NCNR
mileage
others?
Build Board Agenda for July
see draft
ACTION ITEMS
Need rep
for Community Foundation luncheon May 23rd; Ron said yes
Annual meeting, facilitator: We should have an annual meeting acccording
to bylaws. Charlie will contact Steve Talley.
- Ask
Clarke about wastewater plant (639 3947) [Llyn will contact]
- Conference
center at Claytor? Llyn will check on availability.
NOTES